| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Imperius Blackheart
Caldari
KIA Corp
KIA Alliance
   |
Posted - 2008.07.15 13:31:00 -
[1]
Hmm as a generally satisfied Ebank customer I would ask for the directorate to explain what was behind the disagreement was that caused this.
Disagreements are good and healthy as I see it, to a point. However a board member leaving and taking all his funds with him (not showing continued faith or trust) is concerning, especially when so public. Considering he is in a much better position to make informed decisions than the rest of your customers people feeling slightly insecure is natural..
IĘd encourage you to at least come forward with an official statement regarding what the issue of contention was, you donĘt even have to be terribly specific but at least let us know how serious/what it was about.
An organisation with no regulation and based purely on trust like Ebank is hard for some to trust at all, and yet several of us do, and want to continue doing so.
Proud member of the Caldari Death Squad
|
Imperius Blackheart
Caldari
KIA Corp
KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.15 14:02:00 -
[2]
Thanks Hexxx, thats good enough for me.
/me gets on with life and feels reassured.
Proud member of the Caldari Death Squad
|
Imperius Blackheart
Caldari
KIA Corp
KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.16 09:28:00 -
[3]
- Visibility, this is a difficult one, how can one remain visible and transparent and still make investments ensuring return? I would suggest an internal audit team which is souly responsible for reporting to the public the state of Ebank security and investments, only needs to be a very simple process, however this is not perfect as it leaves you open to accusations of having a corrupt audit team. Something IĘve been considering recently is forming a third party Audit business auditing and reporting to the public on the state of investments while maintaining confidentiality simply to increase IPO/Business transparency in EVE without giving anything sensitive away.
Well IĘve said my bit, I hope you all take it in the spirit its intended.
(ooh my longest post ever, damn character limit)
Proud member of the Caldari Death Squad
|
Imperius Blackheart
Caldari
KIA Corp
KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.16 10:20:00 -
[4]
What evidence have you seen of an *increase* in risk? There was always a risk, we deposited our money into an unregulated financial body, there was always risk, its only now its being talked about as if its something special. Yes 175 billion is a lot of isk, yes there should be checks and balances in such large sums being spent, yes Ricdic and PP probably know what they are doing with it and even if what they are doing makes a loss they probably have made enough profit to more than balance it out over the period the bank has been running. Impact on customers are probably low to none.
This kind of thing is inevitable with zero external regulation.
Proud member of the Caldari Death Squad
|
| |
|